Sager v. Howell Trucking Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff-parent was not entitled to reimbursement from DOE where DOE explicitly limited student’s “current educational placement” to a specific school year
• holding that plaintiff-parent was not entitled to reimbursement from DOE where DOE explicitly limited student’s “current educational placement” to a specific school year
• “Under the [stay-put provision of the] statute, the inquiry focuses on identifying ‘the then current educational placement,’ and, further, on who should pay for it.” (emphasis added)
• “Under the [stay-put provision of the] statute, the inquiry focuses on identifying ‘the then current educational placement,’ and, further, on who should pay for it.” (emphasis added)
• “[I]mplicit in the maintenance of the status quo is the requirement that a school district continue to finance an educational placement made by the agency and consented to by the parent before the parent requested a due process hearing”
• “This [pendency] provision is, in effect, an automatic preliminary injunction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).