Sag Harbour Marine, Inc. v. Fickett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that section 78.20 was inapplicable because the yacht had not been retained or redelivered to the defendants on a bond or the dissolution of a prejudgment writ
• where owner did not post forthcoming bond in creditor’s replevin action, provision of statute, which provides for attorneys fees when the owner ultimately prevails with an order dissolving prejudgment writ, did not apply

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).