Safford v. PaineWebber, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding contra non valentem inapplicable because defamatory statements were available at plaintiff’s request
• holding contra non valentem inapplicable because defamatory statements were available at plaintiff's request
• finding that the doctrine of contra non valentem does not 7 apply to a peremptive period, so that unfair trade practices occurring more than one year before suit was filed were time-barred
• “[P]rescription in this case commenced to run when plaintiff received notice that documents had been filed by defendant.”
• \[P]rescription in this case commenced to run when plaintiff received notice that documents had been filed by defendant.\
• evaluating alleged defamatory statement that plaintiff engaged in sexual misconduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).