Saffold v. Mendoza-Powers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a violation of R.C.M. 902(b)(2) was error
• no prejudice although military judge was disqualified under R.C.M. 902(b) as he briefly served as Article 32, UCMJ, investigating officer in appellant’s case; the facts were disclosed on the record and appellant declined to challenge the judge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).