Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Reynolds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \special appeal\ pursuant to Law of March 3, 1901, ch. 854, § 226, 31 Stat. 1225 (former D.C.Code § 17-101 (1940 ed.), repealed by Law of May 24, 1949, ch. 139, § 142, 63 Stat. 110); Martin v. Capital Transit Co., 83 U.S.App.D.C. 239, 170 F.2d 811 (1948) (same
• Good cause shown is “not an idle phrase without significance . . . [it] contemplates an exercise of judgment by the court, not a mere automatic granting of the motion. The Court’s judgment is to be moved by a demonstration by the moving party of its need[.]”
• “special appeal” pursuant to Law of March 3, 1901, ch. 854, § 226, 31 Stat. 1225 (former D.C.Code § 17-101 (1940 ed.), repealed by Law of May 24, 1949, ch. 139, § 142, 63 Stat. 110) ; Martin v. Capital Transit Co., 83 U.S.App.D.C. 239, 170 F.2d 811 (1948) (same

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).