Safeway Stores, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a doctor’s “extensive diagnosis, which provided a detailed explanation supporting his conclusions” was sufficient to rebut the presumption of compensability
• noting that a doctor‟s “extensive diagnosis, which provided a detailed explanation supporting his conclusions” was sufficient to rebut the presumption of compensability
• noting that principles of unjust enrichment can apply where “the injured employee has been otherwise compensated for the same injury”
• reversing Director’s determination that an opinion of art.independent medical examiner retained by the employer did not overcome the presumption of compensability
• the employer’s evidence must be “specific and comprehensive enough to sever the potential connection between the disability and the work-related event.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).