· 7/12/1990
Safeguard Business Systems, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Judith Hoeffel, D/B/A Judith Hoeffel Company
Citations
- 907 F.2d 861
- 18 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 702
- 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 11764
- 1990 WL 95657
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the court has \declined to consider whether certain actions of the court or parties constitute the equivalent of an answer or a motion for summary judgment\
- district court’s orders and judgments filed after a Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1) notice of dismissal are void for want of jurisdiction
- plaintiff has no right to a voluntary dismissal if plaintiff's request for dismissal comes after defendant's answer or motion for summary judgment
- \There may be rare cases with extreme circumstances in which a district court enters a judgment on the merits at an early stage of the proceedings . . . in which the use of Rule 41(a)(1) is foreclosed.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Magill, Gibson, Beam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.