Skip to main content
· 7/12/1990

Safeguard Business Systems, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Judith Hoeffel, D/B/A Judith Hoeffel Company

Citations

  • 907 F.2d 861
  • 18 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 702
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 11764
  • 1990 WL 95657

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the court has \declined to consider whether certain actions of the court or parties constitute the equivalent of an answer or a motion for summary judgment\
  • district court’s orders and judgments filed after a Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1) notice of dismissal are void for want of jurisdiction
  • plaintiff has no right to a voluntary dismissal if plaintiff's request for dismissal comes after defendant's answer or motion for summary judgment
  • \There may be rare cases with extreme circumstances in which a district court enters a judgment on the merits at an early stage of the proceedings . . . in which the use of Rule 41(a)(1) is foreclosed.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Magill, Gibson, Beam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.