Safeco Insurance v. Capri

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, because the lease did not contain an express provision establishing the negligent tenant’s liability for fires, the tenant was an implied coinsured of the landlord
• noting insurance premium is likely passed along to tenant in form of higher rent
• “[T]he tenant is, for the limited, purpose of defeating an insurer’s subrogation claim, an implied coinsured of the landlord.”
• Nevada Supreme Court held that, absent an express lease provision establishing the tenant’s liability for loss for negligently started fires, the tenant is, for the purpose of defeating an insurer’s subrogation claim, an implied co-insured of the landlord.
• yield-up clause makes tenant coinsured with lessor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).