Safeco Insurance Company v. Munroe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that insured was entitled to consequential damages
• holding that insured was entitled to consequential damages
• holding that insured was entitled to consequential damages
• holding that insured was entitled to consequential damages
• holding that insured was entitled to consequential damages
• concluding “wheat 11 field and the crop therein” was tangible property, triggering policy’s coverage for 12 “damages for loss of use of property resulting from injury to tangible property”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).