Skip to main content
· 12/11/2007

Safe Extensions, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration

Citations

  • 509 F.3d 593
  • 379 U.S. App. D.C. 66
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 28540
  • 2007 WL 4302131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no “substantial evidence” to support the FAA’s rationale where it offered “no evidence whatsoever” on the relevant issue
  • “[A]n agency’s ‘declaration of fact that is capable of exact proof but is unsupported by any evidence’ is insufficient to make the agency’s decision non- arbitrary.”
  • “To be deemed ‘final’ and thus reviewable as an order under 49 U.S.C. § 46110, an agency disposition…must determine rights or obligations or give rise to legal consequences.”
  • “To be deemed ‘final’ and thus reviewable as an order under 49 U.S.C. § 46110, an agency disposition…must determine rights or obligations or give rise to legal consequences.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henderson, Tatel, Kavanaugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.