· 12/11/2007
Safe Extensions, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration
Citations
- 509 F.3d 593
- 379 U.S. App. D.C. 66
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 28540
- 2007 WL 4302131
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no “substantial evidence” to support the FAA’s rationale where it offered “no evidence whatsoever” on the relevant issue
- “[A]n agency’s ‘declaration of fact that is capable of exact proof but is unsupported by any evidence’ is insufficient to make the agency’s decision non- arbitrary.”
- “To be deemed ‘final’ and thus reviewable as an order under 49 U.S.C. § 46110, an agency disposition…must determine rights or obligations or give rise to legal consequences.”
- “To be deemed ‘final’ and thus reviewable as an order under 49 U.S.C. § 46110, an agency disposition…must determine rights or obligations or give rise to legal consequences.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henderson, Tatel, Kavanaugh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.