Skip to main content
· 2/3/1989

Safe Energy Coalition of Michigan v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, the Detroit Edison Company, Intervenor

Citations

  • 866 F.2d 1473
  • 275 U.S. App. D.C. 355
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 1062
  • 1989 WL 6669

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that there is no subject matter jurisdiction under Chaney to review the NRC's denial of a section 2.206 request that the NRC act on an \employee concern\ program established by a power plant licensee, and that the NRC did not abdicate its statutory responsibilities in its denial
  • presumption of unreviewability applied to the agency's refusal, based on its interpretation of its own regulations, to take enforcement action against a nuclear reactor
  • presumption of unreviewability applied to the agency’s refusal, based on its interpretation of its own regulations, to take enforcement action against a nuclear reactor
  • “A case is rendered moot when events so unfold as to preclude the possibility of meaningful relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mikva, Buckley, Ginsburg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.