E.D. Virginia· 12/20/2006

Safadi v. Howard

Citations

466 F. Supp. 2d 696
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92722
2006 WL 3780417

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that where a statute does not impose limits on discretionary authority, the entire adjudication process is precluded from judicial review under§ 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii)
concluding that any distinction between the USCIS’s decision and its decision- making process is “untenable” and that federal courts lack jurisdiction to review the USCIS’s discretionary pace of adjudication
concluding that any distinction between the USCIS’s decision and its decision- making process is “untenable” and that federal courts lack jurisdiction to review the USCIS’s discretionary pace of adjudication
concluding that any distinction between the USCIS’s decision and its decision- making process is “untenable” and that federal courts lack jurisdiction to review the USCIS’s discretionary pace of adjudication
finding that citations to Mandamus Act and APA could not establish 3 Section 1252(a)(2)(B
finding that citations to Mandamus Act and APA could not establish subject matter jurisdiction because USCIS does not owe a “clear nondiscretionary duty” to process an adjustment of status application “at any particular pace or speed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.