Saenz v. Trans Union, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Saenz further argues that the reasonableness of Trans Union’s reinvestigations following Saenz’ two disputes of the NCO balance is material to the Section 1681e(b) inquiry. Again, this court disagrees”
• “[W]here evidence of inaccuracy permits the conclusion that a consumer reporting agency’s accuracy-assuring procedures are unreasonable, such evidence is minimally sufficient to create a question of fact for jury determination.”
• “[W]hen a consumer reporting agency learns or should reasonably be aware of errors in its reports that may indicate systematic problems (by virtue of information from consumers, report users, from periodic review of its reporting system, or otherwise
• “If a consumer reporting agency accurately transcribes, stores and communicates consumer information received from a source that it reasonably believes to be reputable, and which is credible on its face, the agency does not violate [§1681e(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).