Saenz v. Saenz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the \change of circumstance\ rule is an aspect of res judicata

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tyson v. Viacom, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-01-12· cited 62×
• Rohlfs v. Rohlfs
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-01-17· cited 6×
• Davis v. Leonard
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-08-18· cited 1×
• Ruiz v. Machin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-29· cited 1×
• Castellvi v. Alvarez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-05-04
• Andrade v. Dantas
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-07

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cortina v. Cortina
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1957-11-20· cited 146×
• Teta v. Teta
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-07-16· cited 52×
• Adams v. Adams
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-11-06· cited 22×
• Hechler v. Hechler
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-11-15· cited 16×
• Malunney v. Pearlstein
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-02-08· cited 14×
• Gilbert v. Gilbert
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1958-09-30· cited 9×
• Lee v. Meeks
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-12-13· cited 4×
• Burley v. Burley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-10-19· cited 4×
• Vannucci v. Vannucci
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-07-31· cited 3×
• Pearson v. Caudle
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-19· cited 2×