Saeid B. Amini v. Oberlin College

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court “erred in failing to consider information contained in [the plaintiff’s] filing, a document referenced in the complaint and attached thereto”
• holding that the statute of limitations began to run when the plaintiff was notified of the employment action at issue
• holding that EEOC charges are a prerequisite to filing a Title VII case and charges are central to the claim
• holding that statute of limitations began running when employer notified plaintiff of 15 employment action
• holding that in a state with its own employment-discrimination laws, like Tennessee, a plaintiff must file a complaint with the EEOC within 300 days of an alleged discriminatory act
• holding that statute of limitations began running when employer notified plaintiff of employment action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).