Skip to main content

Sadler v. State

Citations

  • 949 So. 2d 303
  • 2007 WL 486009

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that State’s “withdrawal” of nolle prosse had no effect because nolle prosse ended the pro ceeding on that charge and the subsequent conviction was a nullity
  • “A court’s jurisdiction to try an accused defendant is not invoked and does not exist unless the State files an information or indictment.[”]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Orfinger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.