Sadio v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a bedroom “immediately adjoined” the 15 No. 1-24-0412 hallway where the defendant was arrested, even though the distance was “greater than the ‘span of one room’ ”
• holding that the district court reasonably “inferr[ed] a threat” when the defendant said things that could be interpreted as “innocent hyperbole” and also used inmates to relay seemingly benign messages to an incarcerated co-conspirator
• holding that a master bedroom immediately adjoined the hallway in which the defendant was arrested because “anyone who exited the master bedroom into the living room would have been in the same undivided open space as the hallway”
• explaining that district courts at sentencing may find that drug conspiracies involved a greater quantity of drugs than were the basis for a jury conviction.
• concluding it was not clear error for the district court to construe defendant's comments that referenced \driving a car over\ another individual as credible threats, even if \the statements in question could be interpreted as innocent hyperbole\
• concluding it was not clear error for the district court to construe defendant’s comments that referenced “driving a car over” another individual as credible threats, even if “the statements in question could be interpreted as innocent hyperbole”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).