· 12/17/1929
Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Haugen
Citations
- 36 F.2d 948
- 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2307
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting “the deference afforded a federal agency’s interpretation of its own statutes” under Chevron
- “Since the Department did not adequately consider hospitals’ costs when readopting its rates, the Department’s actions were arbitrary and capricious and contrary to law”
- “Since the Department did not adequately consider hospitals’ costs when readopting its rates, the Department’s actions were arbitrary and capricious and contrary to law”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dietrich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.