Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Curtis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that state constitutional rights afforded “[i]n all criminal prosecutions,” Or. Const. art. I, § 11, do not apply to a punitive contempt proceeding in Oregon “because contempt is not a criminal prosecution”
• “[A] contempt proceeding is neither civil nor criminal . . . [but] a unique and inherent power of a court to ensure compliance with its orders.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).