Sacramento Municipal Utility Dist. v. Kwan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this Court reviews the factual findings regarding notice under the “clearly erroneous” standard of review
• concluding that Board found one letter alone satisfied Secretary's section 5103(a) duty despite discussion of other documents within the decision
• concluding that Board found one letter alone satisfied Secretary’s section 5103(a) duty despite discussion of other documents within the decision
• holding that VA cured failure to afford statutory notice to claimant prior to initial rating decision by issuing notification letter after decision and readjudicating claim and notifying claimant of such readjudication in the statement of the case
• finding that a notice defect may be cured by issuance of a fully compliant notification followed by a re-adjudication of the claim
• noting that a timing defect may be cured by the issuance of fully compliant notification followed by a re- adjudication of the claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).