Sacramento Crushing Corp. v. Correct/All Sewer, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• treating a request for sanctions pursuant to Rule 137 as brought under Rule 375 and addressing the merits
• “In the face of supporting affidavits from the moving party, the nonmovant must submit counteraffidavits (or refer to depositions or admissions on file
• “The suggestion that an issue of material fact exists, without supporting evidence, is insufficient to create one.”
• “In the face of supporting affidavits from the moving party, the nonmovant must submit counteraffidavits (or refer to depositions or admissions on file) in order to raise an issue of fact sufficient to survive summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).