Sacra v. Stewart

Citations

• 32 Tex. 185

Syllabus

<p>1— The exclusion of evidence which, if introduced, could only have established facts which were admitted in the pleadings of the opposing party, could work no prejuduce to the party who offered it; and, therefore, can not entitle him to a reversal of judgment.</p> <p>2— When, under our statute, a defendant is interrogated by the plaintiff, he has a right to state other facts tending to his defense, and closely connected with the fact on which he is interrogated, and such other facts have as much effect as his answer to the question itself; and a denial of such other facts by the plaintiff, in an amended petition, can not impair or invalidate their force and effect as evidence.</p>