Skip to main content
· 11/30/2009

Sacks v. Standard Insurance

Citations

  • 671 F. Supp. 2d 1148
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111331

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In weighing the evidence, this Court finds that an analysis of the case-specific factors establishes that Standard’s claim decision was tainted by its financial interest.”
  • “An administrator abuses its discretion when it fails to consider how the side effects of a claimant’s medication impact the claimant’s ability to 4 perform her ‘own occupation.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dale S. Fischer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.