Sackman v. Liggett Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiffs would not be prejudiced by the intervention because it was for the limited purpose of challenging a discovery order
• noting that because “these Rule 24 motions are for the limited purpose of objecting” to a discovery order and were filed ten days after the entry of that order “any delay is negligible”
• “the [ ]intervenors reason that [the defendant] may have a somewhat different agenda with respect to its litigation tactics than [they do]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A., Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 2007-02-15· cited 138×
• Allied Irish Banks, P.L.C. v. Bank of America, N.A.
  S.D. New York· 2008-03-26· cited 41×
• In re Investigation of World Arrangements with Relation to the Production, Transportation, Refining & Distribution of Petroleum
  District of Columbia· 1952-11-10· cited 29×
• In Re Breast Implant Cases
  S.D. New York· 1996-10-23· cited 20×
• Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
  D. Kansas· 1997-08-14· cited 19×
• Sackman v. Liggett Group, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 1997-06-09· cited 12×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Callahan
  E.D. New York· 2014-03-05· cited 12×
• Dorsett v. County of Nassau
  E.D. New York· 2012-11-26· cited 11×
• Nance v. Thompson Medical Co.
  E.D. Texas· 1997-05-02· cited 7×
• Berroyer v. United States
  E.D. New York· 2012-05-05· cited 5×
• Dorsett v. County of Nassau
  E.D. New York· 2012-05-22· cited 5×
• Waterlegacy v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
  D. Minnesota· 2014-06-02· cited 5×
• M. Morgan Cherry & Associates, Ltd. v. Cherry
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2002-01-22· cited 4×
• Rodriguez v. Pataki
  S.D. New York· 2002-10-29· cited 2×
• United Parcel Service of America, Inc. v. Net, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 2005-01-15· cited 2×
• United States v. Real Property Located at 272 Old Montauk Highway
  E.D. New York· 2014-02-22· cited 2×
• Caldera v. Microsoft Corp.
  D. Utah· 1998-07-28· cited 1×
• Emery v. Wood Industries, et al.
  D. New Hampshire· 2001-01-17· cited 1×
• El-Ad Residences at Miramar Condominium Ass'n v. Mt. Hawley Insurance
  S.D. Florida· 2010-06-02
• Sineise v. Texaco Carribean, Inc.
  Virgin Islands· 1998-03-06

Other cases named Sackman v. Liggett Group, Inc.

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Sackman v. Liggett Group, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 1997-06-09· cited 12×
• Sackman v. Liggett Group, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 1997-06-27· cited 12×
• Sackman v. Liggett Group, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 1996-03-19· cited 9×
• Sackman v. Liggett Group, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 1999-05-21· cited 1×