Sackett v. Grinstead

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiffs met the “minimal” injury requirement under “because Plaintiffs have shown that they could not readily determine the total hours worked and applicable hourly pay, which made it difficult for them to determine the amount of overtime worked”
• concluding appraisers did not exercise discretion as to matters of significance
• \At least one regularly performed duty or task must fall squarely within ... one of the 'duties' prong of the administrative exemption.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).