Sachs v. Stanley Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Medical Practice Act £regulat[es] medical professionals in order to protect the public welfare’ ”
• “The Medical Practice Act 'regulat[es] medical professionals in order to protect the public welfare' ”
• the State has a substantial interest in promoting the general welfare and whether the course chosen by the legislature to achieve a desired result is either wise or the best means available is not a proper subject of judicial inquiry
• the State has a substantial interest in promoting the general welfare and whether the course chosen by the legislature to achieve a desired result is either wise or the best means available is not a proper subject of judicial inquiry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).