Skip to main content
· 8/19/2010

Sachs v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 251 P.3d 543
  • 2010 Colo. App. LEXIS 1169
  • 2010 WL 3259822

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “ambiguous coverage provisions in an insurance contract are liberally construed in favor of the insured”
  • affirming summary judgment for insurer based on owned premises exclusion in homeowners policy
  • “[W]e construe the policy so that all provisions are harmonious and none is rendered meaningless.”
  • “An insurer has a duty to defend its policyholder when the underlying complaint alleges any facts or claims that might fall within the ambit of the policy.”
  • “An insurer has a duty to defend its policyholder when the underlying complaint alleges any facts or claims that might fall within the ambit of the policy. The insurer must defend against all claims as long as any one of them is arguably covered under the policy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loeb, Graham, Sternberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.