Saccurato Inc. v. Masters, Inc. (In Re Masters, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Rule 9019 requires a motion and judicial approval
• bankruptcy court 13 erred in finding that Rule 9019(a) notice requirement did not 14 apply to settlement agreement because the settlement terms were 15 read into the record in open court after two days of trial and 16 with all relevant parties present and assenting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).