· 3/3/2006
Sac & Fox Tribe v. Bureau of Indian Affairs
Citations
- 439 F.3d 832
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that jurisdiction to resolve “internal tribal disputes” is in the tribe and not in. federal district court
- noting that jurisdiction to resolve “internal tribal disputes” is in the tribe and not in federal district court
- “Even in the absence of a challenge from any party, courts have an independent obligation to determine whether subject matter jurisdiction exists.”
- “Once the district court became aware that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction, it had no choice but to dismiss the claim.” (citing Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp., 546 U.S. 500 (2006)). As noted above, Reed seeks to bring this action under the FOIA. Under 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wollman, Lay, Arnold
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.