· 11/27/2006
Sac and Fox Nation v. Norton
Citations
- 585 F. Supp. 2d 1293
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98266
- 2006 WL 6117555
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The relevant inquiry for Rule 19(a) is not whether the absent person has an ‘interest,’ in the broad sense, in the outcome of the litigation, but whether cognizable legal rights of the absent person will be prejudiced by the suit’s continuation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: David L. Russell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.