Sabrina L. Dunn v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[a] rivet or a laminate ... is meant to remain permanent, unremovable unless one is bent on breaking the permanent structure-apart”
• “Courts do not rewrite claims; instead, we give effect to the terms chosen by the patentee.”
• “[A] dispute over the ordinary and accustomed meaning does not imply that such a meaning does not exist.”
• “[T]he doctrine of equivalents must ... remain within the boundaries established by ... the scope of the patent claims .... ”
• affirming grant of summary judgment of no infringement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).