Sabouri v. Ohio Department of Jobs & Family Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding 24 jurisdiction to review whether federal agency “complied with their own procedures to (1) 25 adjudicate Plaintiff’s DACA renewal application, and (2) terminate Plaintiff’s DACA 26 status”
• \[T]he public has an interest in government agencies being required to comply with their own written guidelines instead of engaging in arbitrary decision making.\
• \[T]he public has an interest in government agencies being required to comply with their own written guidelines instead of engaging in arbitrary decision making.\
• “[T]he public has an interest in government agencies being required to comply with their own written guidelines instead of engaging in arbitrary decision making.”
• “[T]he public has an interest in government agencies being required to comply with their own written guidelines instead of engaging in arbitrary decision making . . . .”
• \[T]he Court is not deprived of jurisdiction by § 1252(g) to consider whether [the agencies] followed their own procedures in denying Plaintiff's application for DACA renewal or terminating her DACA status.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).