Skip to main content
· 8/1/1916

Sabin v. Kyniston

Citations

  • 81 Or. 358
  • 159 P. 69
  • 1916 Ore. LEXIS 274

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Res judicata] serves to bar certain claims in federal court based on the binding effect of past determinations in arbitral proceedings.”
  • There is “no significant difference between New York’s preclusion law and federal preclusion law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burnett, Consideration, Took

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.