· 8/1/1916
Sabin v. Kyniston
Citations
- 81 Or. 358
- 159 P. 69
- 1916 Ore. LEXIS 274
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[Res judicata] serves to bar certain claims in federal court based on the binding effect of past determinations in arbitral proceedings.”
- There is “no significant difference between New York’s preclusion law and federal preclusion law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burnett, Consideration, Took
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.