Skip to main content
· 1/13/1920

Saari v. Wells Fargo Express Co.

Citations

  • 109 Wash. 415
  • 186 P. 898
  • 1920 Wash. LEXIS 911

Syllabus

<p>Municipal Corporations (379, 380, 389)—Use of Streets—Crossing and Passing—Negligence—Evidence—Sufficiency. That defendant, driving a truck which was run into by plaintiff’s motorcycle at a street intersection, had the right of way and was exercising due care, is established where there was evidence that he entered the street intersection first and made a lawful turn when he was hit from behind and the ordinance gave vehicles to the right the right of way and required plaintiff to look out for the truck, and there was little evidence that defendant was driving other than in a careful manner.</p> <p>Appeal (417)—Review—Findings—Preponderance of Evidence. While the findings of the trial court upon conflicting evidence are ordinarily adopted, they will be reversed on appeal if not supported by the preponderance of the evidence.</p>

Judges: Holcomb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.