Saari v. Fieweger
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 1593
Syllabus
The unequal distributive award was not supported by findings in the record. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in setting an alternative date for valuing marital assets and terminating temporary support orders retroactive to the date of the final hearing. The court's valuation of newly vested stocks and options is conflicting and not supported by the record but the order for a third-party valuation of the marital value of unvested stock was within the court's authority.
Judges: Sulek
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.