Saab Cars Usa, Inc. v. United States, Defendant-Cross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in the absence of evidence of temporal proximity, claimant must provide more than warranty agreements and more specific descriptions
• holding that in the absence of evidence of temporal proximity, claimant must provide more than warranty agreements and more specific descriptions
• noting that when a party fails to respond to an opposing party’s motion for summary judgment, a court can enter judgment against the nonresponsive party if the moving party is otherwise entitled as matter of law
• noting that when a party fails to provide opposing evidence to respond to a moving party’s motion for summary judgment, a court can enter judgment against the nonresponsive party if the moving party is otherwise entitled as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).