S. Utsunomiya Enterprises, Inc. v. Moomuku Country Club

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \attorneys' fees incurred in defending an attack on title against a third party would be recoverable as consequential damages in a corresponding breach of covenant action against the grantor of the `defective' property\
• holding that “attorneys’ fees incurred in de fending an attack on title against a third party would be recoverable as consequential damages in a corresponding breach of covenant action against the grantor of the ‘defective’ property”
• holding that attorney’s fees incurred at trial and on appeal are separate
• language of HRS § 607-14 (1993) providing for payment of attorneys’ fees involving actions in the nature of assumpsit in “all the courts” permits appellate court to award attorneys’ fees incurred on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).