S. S. v. D. M.
Citations
- 228 Conn. App. 559
Syllabus
The defendant, a former police officer, appealed from the judgment of the trial court granting an application for a civil protective order for the plaintiff, a police chief, filed pursuant to statute (§ 46b-16a (a)) on the basis of stalking. The defendant claimed, inter alia, that the trial court abused its discretion in issuing the order of civil protection, as modified, because the trial court did not make the requisite factual findings. Held: The trial court abused its discretion in issuing the modified order of civil protection without having made the necessary factual findings that there were reasonable grounds to believe that the defendant both had stalked the plaintiff and would have continued to stalk the plaintiff. Argued September 5—officially released October 8, 2024
Judges: Bright; Moll; Flynn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.