S & R Med., P.C. v. GEICO Gen. Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the exclusion of sex trafficking victims’ history of prostitution before meeting their trafficker and collecting cases from the First, Second, Seventh, and Eight Circuits doing the same
• “There is no requirement that a commercial sex act actually occurred, must less that fraud in fact caused the commercial sex act.”
• “[T]he crime is complete when the defendant recruits, entices, harbors, etc. the victim with knowledge that the prohibited means will be used in the future to cause them to engage in commercial sex acts.”
• “In considering Sixth Amendment challenges, specifically, the Confrontation Clause guarantees an opportunity for effective cross-examination, not cross-examination that is effective in whatever way, and to whatever extent, the defense might wish.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).