Skip to main content
· 10/26/1984

S. Leo Harmonay, Inc. v. Binks Manufacturing Co.

Citations

  • 597 F. Supp. 1014
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing New York’s approach to contractual choice-of-law clauses as being “stated succinctly” in the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws § 187
  • court granted prejudgment interest on damages for labor inefficiency, even though these damages, “uncertain in amount,” were not ascertained until the court made its posttrial findings of fact and conclusions of law
  • failure of general contractor to provide layout drawings in a timely and orderly manner requiring subcontractor to work on accelerated basis with increased work hours and costs is basis to award subcontractor the extra costs
  • presenting a test where a different state’s law may apply

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Irving Ben Cooper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.