Skip to main content
· 7/7/1977

S. H. Kress-Shoreview, Inc. v. Kleiman

Citations

  • 58 A.D.2d 763
  • 396 N.Y.S.2d 244
  • 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12920

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a District Court’s “duplicati[on]” of “efforts at an early stage of the case may result - jn unnecessary expenses for the parties, particularly given that dispositive motions and settlement may resolve the proceeding in advance of trial”
  • “Permitting the Bankruptcy Court to oversee pretrial matters in this proceeding, and withdrawing it only when it is ripe for a jury trial, promotes judicial economy and a timely resolution of this case.”
  • “Proceedings should not be withdrawn for the sole reason that they are non-core.”
  • “Proceedings should not be withdrawn for the sole reason that they are non-core.”
  • bankruptcy court presided over adversary proceeding alleging professional negligence, malpractice, and breach of contract on the part of debtor’s accountants
  • “[T]he Bankruptcy Court’s familiarity with the underlying facts and issues is an important consideration. Duplicating those efforts at an early stage of the case may result in unnecessary expenses for the parties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.