· 7/7/1977
S. H. Kress-Shoreview, Inc. v. Kleiman
Citations
- 58 A.D.2d 763
- 396 N.Y.S.2d 244
- 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12920
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a District Court’s “duplicati[on]” of “efforts at an early stage of the case may result - jn unnecessary expenses for the parties, particularly given that dispositive motions and settlement may resolve the proceeding in advance of trial”
- “Permitting the Bankruptcy Court to oversee pretrial matters in this proceeding, and withdrawing it only when it is ripe for a jury trial, promotes judicial economy and a timely resolution of this case.”
- “Proceedings should not be withdrawn for the sole reason that they are non-core.”
- “Proceedings should not be withdrawn for the sole reason that they are non-core.”
- bankruptcy court presided over adversary proceeding alleging professional negligence, malpractice, and breach of contract on the part of debtor’s accountants
- “[T]he Bankruptcy Court’s familiarity with the underlying facts and issues is an important consideration. Duplicating those efforts at an early stage of the case may result in unnecessary expenses for the parties”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.