S. Commc'ns Servs., Inc. v. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A motion under Rule 59(e) is not an opportunity to re-argue a case.” (quoting Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Engler, 146 F.3d 367, 374 (6th Cir. 1998))
• interpreting the meaning of the word ‘individual’ under the ADA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).