Skip to main content
· 5/21/1976

S. C. Loveland, Inc. v. East West Towing, Inc.

Citations

  • 415 F. Supp. 596
  • 1978 A.M.C. 2293
  • 20 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 76
  • 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14960

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff was comparatively negligent for damage to bridge because it “was negligent in taking no action to prevent [a] drifting barge from colliding with its bridge” and “the possibility of an eventual collision with the bridge was foreseeable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roettger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.