S. Bravo Systems, Inc. v. Containment Technologies Corporation, S. Bravo Systems, Inc. v. Containment Technologies Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court abused its discretion by denying a motion for Rule 11 sanctions without adequate explanation
• holding that pre-filing investigation requires that the claims be interpreted
• “A ‘frivolous’ argument or claim is one that is ‘both baseless and made without a reasonable and competent inquiry.’ ”
• unsupported assertions do not satisfy requirement of designating specific evidence creating a genuine issue of material fact
• attorney may not rely on client’s lay opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).