S & a Farms, Inc. v. Farms. Com, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that where plaintiff presented no expert testimony on the relevant standard of care, a reasonable jury would have no way of knowing whether Farms.com acted within the standard of care, so summary judgment was appropriate
• concluding that where plaintiff presented no expert testimony on the relevant standard of care, a reasonable jury would have no way of knowing whether Farms.com acted within the standard of care, so summary judgment was appropriate
• “[I]t is not enough for a plaintiff to show a CEA violation and damages, rather a plaintiff must show that the CEA violation proximately caused the damages for which the plaintiff seeks relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).