S. A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense (Varig Airlines), Plaintiff v. The Boeing Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the application of 26 27 6 The parties do not dispute that California Code of Civil Procedure Section 361, California’s “borrowing 28 1 Washington law as controlling on all relevant issues
• “In diversity cases, federal courts must apply the 4 conflict-of-law principles of the forum state.”
• “When 21 a change of venue occurs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), ‘[t]he transferee district court 22 must be obligated to apply the state law that would have been applied if there had been no 23 change of venue.’”
• “[I]n the case of contracts with choice-of-law 7 provisions, California will apply the substantive law designated by the contract unless the 8 transaction falls into either of two exceptions: (1) the chosen state has no substantial 9 relationship to the parties or the transaction, or (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).