Rytter v. Parthenides

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court adequately considered defendant’s history and characteristics when it noted that it reviewed letters submitted in support of defendant and character testimony at sentencing
• upholding a within guideline sentence where the District Court “reasonably concluded that [defendant’s] offense was very serious, ‘strik[ing] at the core of our democracy’”
• finding no authority “precluding a sentencing court from considering a fact at the § 3553(a) stage merely because that fact is also relevant to the Guidelines calculation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).