Skip to main content
· 2/8/1950

Ryska v. Anderson

Citations

  • 214 P.2d 874
  • 70 Idaho 207
  • 1950 Ida. LEXIS 162

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the non-compete clause was combined with the sale of a business and holding the clause was reasonably limited as to scope; the clause at issue did not specifically articulate prohibitive competitive activity
  • similar covenant by seller of hardware business, including leasehold rights, personal property and good will

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Givens, Holden, Porter, Taylor, Keeton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.