Rynn v. Jaffe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a plaintiff cannot “cite the Ninth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution to support a § 1983 action”
• explaining that a plaintiff cannot “cite the Ninth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution to support a § 1983 action”
• considering prejudice to the defendant in finding that extension of time was warranted
• “In essence, plaintiffs point to the same intentional acts that underlie their other tort claims, but they append the word ‘negligently.’ This is insufficient[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).