Court of Appeals of Washington· 12/7/1972
Ryland v. Universal Oil Co.
Citations
- 504 P.2d 1171
- 8 Wash. App. 43
- 1972 Wash. App. LEXIS 906
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that substantial compliance with affidavit requirement was accomplished even though affidavit was filed subsequent to the running of the statute of limitations; a “holding otherwise would be a sacrifice of substance to form.”
- late filing of affidavit of extraterritorial personal service upon defendant found to substantially comply with service of process statute
- late filing of affidavit of extraterritorial personal service upon defendant found to substantially comply with service of process statute
- Substantial compliance is all our Supreme Court requires \where personal service is made and no injury results to the defendant by a late filing of the affidavit.\
- Substantial compliance is all our Supreme Court requires “where personal service is made and no injury results to the defendant by a late filing of the affidavit.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court· 1988-02-17· cited 400×
- French v. GabrielCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-03-19· cited 21×
- Hatch v. Princess Louise Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1975-05-05· cited 15×
- Sammamish Pointe Homeowners Ass'n v. Sammamish Pointe L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-03-10· cited 15×
- Sammamish Pointe Homeowners Ass'n v. Sammamish Pointe LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-03-10· cited 12×
- Schell v. Tri-State IrrigationCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-03-08· cited 11×
- Puget Sound Bulb Exchange v. Metal Buildings Insulation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1973-07-12· cited 11×
- Dubois v. KapuniCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-11-08· cited 2×
- Mu-Petco Shipping Co. v. Divesco, Inc.S.D. Mississippi· 1984-05-09· cited 1×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Golden Gate Hop Ranch, Inc. v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1965-06-17· cited 73×
- Thayer v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1972-12-06· cited 67×
- Muncie v. Westcraft Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 1961-03-30· cited 19×
- Whitney v. KnowltonWashington Supreme Court· 1903-12-03· cited 17×
- Schmelling v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court· 1920-07-07· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.