Skip to main content
· 12/7/1972

Ryland v. Universal Oil Co.

Citations

  • 504 P.2d 1171
  • 8 Wash. App. 43
  • 1972 Wash. App. LEXIS 906

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that substantial compliance with affidavit requirement was accomplished even though affidavit was filed subsequent to the running of the statute of limitations; a “holding otherwise would be a sacrifice of substance to form.”
  • late filing of affidavit of extraterritorial personal service upon defendant found to substantially comply with service of process statute
  • late filing of affidavit of extraterritorial personal service upon defendant found to substantially comply with service of process statute
  • Substantial compliance is all our Supreme Court requires \where personal service is made and no injury results to the defendant by a late filing of the affidavit.\
  • Substantial compliance is all our Supreme Court requires “where personal service is made and no injury results to the defendant by a late filing of the affidavit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.